|
|
LETTER TO THE EDITOR |
|
Year : 2021 | Volume
: 9
| Issue : 3 | Page : 150 |
|
Comment on “Study of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with glycaemic control”
Bharat Gurnani1, Kirandeep Kaur2
1 Department of Cornea and Refractive Services, Department of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus, Pondicherry, India 2 Aravind Eye Hospital and Post Graduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry, India
Date of Submission | 18-Apr-2021 |
Date of Decision | 10-Jun-2021 |
Date of Acceptance | 10-Jun-2021 |
Date of Web Publication | 27-Sep-2021 |
Correspondence Address: Kirandeep Kaur Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Services, Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Puducherry-605 007 India
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/jcor.jcor_56_21
How to cite this article: Gurnani B, Kaur K. Comment on “Study of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with glycaemic control”. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2021;9:150 |
How to cite this URL: Gurnani B, Kaur K. Comment on “Study of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with glycaemic control”. J Clin Ophthalmol Res [serial online] 2021 [cited 2023 Jun 8];9:150. Available from: https://www.jcor.in/text.asp?2021/9/3/150/326794 |
Dear Editor,
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is considered one of the fastest-growing epidemic diseases of the 21st century, with a high prevalence of approximately 2%–6% worldwide.[1] It is a multifactorial metabolic syndrome. The clinical manifestation of uncontrolled hyperglycemia together with disturbances in metabolism carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action, or both.[2] We read the article by Menezes et al.[3] and we must congratulate the authors for bringing out this important analysis. However, we have few important observations and suggestions to make.
First, can the authors highlight what was the period during which the study was performed? This is important since during the corona period most of the studies were at halt due to reduction in patient volume and if the study was performed during COVID-19 times, then COVID-19 screening protocol and consent deserve a mention in the methodology.
Second, what was the criteria for choosing normal control, based on fasting and postprandial blood sugar levels or Hb1Ac was also taken into account is not highlighted in the study. Can the authors throw light over this for the benefit of the readers.
Finally, what was the reason was excluding severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and PDR patients. This along with Type 1 DM patients which were not taken for analysis is missing in the exclusion criteria. This needs clarification. Once again we would like to congratulate the authors for bringing out this important analysis.
Acknowledgments
Aravind Eye Hospital and Postgraduate Institute of Ophthalmology, Pondicherry.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
References | |  |
1. | Samah S, Ramasamy K, Lim SM, Neoh CF. Probiotics for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2016;118:172-82. |
2. | Peng PH, Lin HS, Lin S. Nerve fibre layer thinning in patients with preclinical retinopathy. Can J Ophthalmol 2009;44:417-22. |
3. | Menezes V, Usgaonkar UP, Nagvenkar A. Study of peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus and its correlation with glycemic control. J Clin Ophthalmol Res 2021;9:9-13. [Full text] |
|